I will agree with Tasha: coming up with a new name has been no easy task. I really think the name should emphasize "interact" because I think that's what makes what we are doing unique. It's news that people can interact with and make their own. As I'm learning in my media editing class, in today's world, it's no longer the editors choosing what's news. The people, or the audience, chooses their 'news.' They decide what is important to them and can, if they want, choose to only be informed of news they are interested in learning about. And with the interfaces we are creating, consumers of media have so many options to exploring the news.
So the two names I have come up with so far is either UserNews or Mediactive. With UserNews, I incorporated the word 'user' because a 'user' is the term used for someone who interacts with media. I think this name kind of encompasses what we are doing. We are creating user news. News for users to interact with.
Mediactive I think could also be a cool name because it combines 'media' and 'interactive.' Two things that best describe the products we are creating. It's interactive media, which can refer to the multiple forms of technology we are using or media as in news.
0 Reply to "New Name"
Post a Comment